Ask The Experts
General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: T Severini on May 15, 2019, 07:47:26 PM
-
I can\'t find it.
Bet and lost on Maximum Security and on TFigs he looked just as much as the play to me. But where is the analysis??? Am I blind?
Tony Bada Bing
-
Do you ever buy anything here?
Or just pop up on big race days to tell us all how brilliant you are??
For $25 bucks you wouldn\'t have had to wonder if you were blind.
-
Actually it was $20. There was an A, B, C, D groups. The A had Game Winner and Improbable as most likely winner. There was a considerable amount of study analysis that was AGAINST Omaha Beach. But he was in the B as a hedge.
Tje patterns and reads and data were informative. I bet my horse anyway who was Tacitus and he was in the B.
-
P-Dub Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do you ever buy anything here?
>
> Or just pop up on big race days to tell us all how
> brilliant you are??
>
> For $25 bucks you wouldn\'t have had to wonder if
> you were blind.
You are assuming interest in regard to bad analysis on my part.
-
How do you know it was bad if you didnt buy it? You never looked at it obviously.
The explanation was the last race 1 was pretty much a pair of the prior race 0. He was considered a B Play when at the same time the other primary speed who they didnt like was still considered to be in the race. Now only a total idiot would criticize something they never read or paid for. Get lost cheap skate
-
and you are assuming I\'m only interested in the analysis of the winner.
Anyway, I have the material for the Preakness and will join the discussion.
But back to the winner. Theres a lot to factor in that blown turn in regard to how fast that animal ran. At least to my eye.