Ask The Experts
General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: HP on August 26, 2012, 09:25:39 AM
-
I really think we should\'ve had a number up here for Willy Beamin. Between Weds. evening and Saturday AM I would think that was do-able? For Travers day?
HP
-
Didn\'t we get a notice that it was a 4? Anyhow, I played it as a 4 and I still didn\'t like him on 2 days rest off an effort (even though he won and moved forward in almost the same scenario about a month or so ago). Good to those who played it that way.
-
I don\'t go by Miff\'s estimates. How you played it and what you liked or didn\'t like is not relevant to what I\'m saying.
HP
-
\"I don\'t go by Miff\'s estimates\"
HP,
...errr wanna bet? a pony ride :)
Mike
-
I wasn\'t going by miff\'s estimate. I got an email from TG on Friday saying that he ran a 4 1/4 in the West Point.
-
Sorry. Email notice was on Staurday.
-
In any event, the number is pretty much secondary. Either you believe in the magic or you don\'t...
-
The magic that has him like 6 for 50 at the meet, that magic?
-
Did not run in the West Point.
HP
-
Did not see it before I left. O well. HP
-
Sorry. My bad. What was the state bred stake?
-
The Albany.
-
Curious. Would it have changed your opinion on him?
-
No. The magic that resulted in 4 straight victories, steadily improving figures and a 10-year ban. I was simply making the point that in yesterday\'s instance, the figure in the Albany wasn\'t that relevant
-
Of course. If it was a 5 that\'s one thing and if it\'s a 0 that\'s another. Hey people had it. What do I know? Honestly horse looked like it could have been anything going into this race. I know how I felt when it was over. These guys are too much. I\'m happy for the winners and I\'ll leave it at that.
HP