Ask The Experts

General Category => Ask the Experts => Topic started by: Ill-bred on October 12, 2012, 10:02:48 PM

Title: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: Ill-bred on October 12, 2012, 10:02:48 PM

I thought the inside was very good the last two days on the turf course.

Helps the case for your bomber key.

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: shanahan on October 13, 2012, 12:00:31 AM

Likely to make the tri?
Sanitar, lemonade, and tannery for me

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: Ill-bred on October 13, 2012, 08:58:13 AM

Yeah, I am using Better Lucky underneath in the verticals.

Maybe squeeze her onto a p4 ticket...

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: shanahan on October 13, 2012, 04:27:49 PM

Adayatthespa.  A friend of mine once asked me if I knew why jockeys wore small hats...a half in 49?  WTF?  The only people who could not figure out 8 would go to the lead and slow it down were the other 7 jocks.

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: Lost Cause on October 13, 2012, 07:19:03 PM

shanahan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Adayatthespa.  A friend of mine once asked me if I
> knew why jockeys wore small hats...a half in 49?
> WTF?  The only people who could not figure out 8
> would go to the lead and slow it down were the
> other 7 jocks.


Hey Shan,no attack on you as I hammered the 1 & 4 box but I think handicappers that play against a capable lone speed horse are the ones that should wear the small hats...It is consistently one of THE money making plays I personally have ever seen.  My reasoning for boxing the 1and 4 only?? I said they would be closest to the lone speed and they would run over that one in the end...what the hell did I base that running over them in the end part I\'m still trying to figure out...didn\'t even include a just in case bet with him on top..

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: shanahan on October 14, 2012, 07:51:23 AM

Lost, did you base the 8 being lone speed on Race Shapes?  I did not pick up sheets yesterday, just curious.  If you based it on the Form, jocks read that every day I hope.

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: Rick B. on October 14, 2012, 01:08:13 PM

shanahan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you based it on the Form, jocks read
> that every day I hope.

I used to assume the same thing. I was aghast when
I was told by a jock agent that in fact very few ever
read the Form.

Wouldn\'t you want to know what kind of animal you
are riding? Jeez.

Title: Re: Keeneland and the QEII
Post by: Lost Cause on October 16, 2012, 06:52:19 AM

Rick B. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> shanahan Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If you based it on the Form, jocks read
> > that every day I hope.
>
> I used to assume the same thing. I was aghast
> when
> I was told by a jock agent that in fact very few
> ever
> read the Form.
>
> Wouldn\'t you want to know what kind of animal you
> are riding? Jeez.