10
« on: November 09, 2005, 08:54:56 PM »
I added a few numbers
Rags ....................................... Thoro
Imperialism 3-8-1-13-4 ............. 1, 2, 1, 2, 1
Flower Alley 3-0-0-15-0 ........ . -1, -2, -2, 5, -2
Suave 5-6-3- 9-1 ................ 1, 2, 0, 0, -1
Sun King 5-5-2-11-6 .............. 0, 0, -1, 2, 2
Borrego 8-5-2- 5-4 ............... 2, 0, 0, -3, 0
Perfect Drift 4-6-1-6-2 .......... 0, 0, 0, 0, -2
Sir Shackleton 9-7-5-3-5 .......... 2, 0, 0, 0, 0
My question is \"What is the probability that these horses not bounce?\"
According to your numbers, they don\'t bounce (hardly ever) which is not believable. Horses are not machines. They are athletes that have ups and downs as any athlete does.
The point of \"if Imperialism ran the 4 in the Gold Cup he would have won\" is nonsense. I guess you would also say if Silver Train ran his 0+ Sheet # for his win the the BC Sprint in the JCGC, he would have won by a mile. Those comparisons can\'t be made. It just doesn\'t make sense.