4
« on: August 19, 2011, 07:57:04 PM »
Fair enough point(s) Rick B , \'Top and others but , I wasn\'t necessarily intending to bash the Trainer - but only that type of campaign IMO.
... but now while we are on the subject ,and speaking personally as a sheets player only and to qualify these and earlier remarks as such . Unless I\'m mistaken , I have read here on this forum and as well in many other well respected sources of information elsewhere , that a horse may drop up to 20 lbs in weight after a race - and also ,in a legitimate\"Catastrophic / Rear Breakdowns study(s)\" posted on this site a few years ago , there is a direct connection between workout miles /racing miles and a higher degree breakdowns .
Just as something to consider in my view ,and this does not pertain to anybody in this conversation or any horse at this strip but- what is one to make of horses at 4+5 yo and older running 12 to 14 point top efforts and the like ? Even on a best possible circumstance imho, late developing campaigns and late developing breeding (those unraced at 2 + 3 yo not-with-standing ) can really only account for a couple points worth of \"development \" !
Perhaps I\'m a fiscally conservative and socially liberal type but imho , I favor the use of Lasix because I feel it\'s \"good\" for the horses who are at varying degree\'s of being bleeders , but I would like to see Zero tolerance with use of other\"medications\" or \"substances\"..
There is quite a bit of history with that Trainer and certainly any speculation that is on the table with Dutrow would be perfectly understandable - even just common sense imo , at least as a handicapper and on an Academic level as well . Not sure - but OK I guess that I don\'t get the Dutrow / Abrams connection , however the way I personally see things ,it\'s apple\'s and oranges -they are in 2 completely different leagues