6
« on: November 05, 2007, 11:31:20 AM »
For those that argue good training and vetting accounts for many of these move-ups mentioned and that we can\'t assume illegal drugs are prevalent in horse racing--I don\'t agree. Big picture, we now KNOW other \"sports\" are riddled with drug/enhancing agent issues. This \"sport\" involves horses who can\'t talk and whose underpinnings revolve around gambling, large purses, breeding fees, etc. Suspicion and testing should be double or triple what it is compared to other \"sports\", thats just common sense. If thier issues are bad, I suspect racings are much worse. What is more troublesome is pinning down specific names. But it seems trainer patterns may help indicate suspicious trends, and as JB has called for, Vet disclosures would help even more. When the trainer and vet patterns overlay each other, you probably have something (other than $$ for sore hoofs).
Boy, that was interesting hearing Allday go after Dicky though. That is some bad blood. Where is that one big whistle-blower that brings down some really big names with more than just venom?