10
« on: November 09, 2009, 09:49:09 PM »
Okay, Zen is the greatest horse ever to race on Pro Ride. 14-14 is impressive, no matter what the competition, but was she really such a big surprise in the Classic? Who, or what, did she really beat? Were the best horses even running in this race?
MTB-well documented dislike for the Pro Ride, won his big race in the slop. Lots of horses have beaten this guy since the Derby.
CJ-big gaps in the PP’s tell me this horse has issues. Has run well on this surface but it’s been awhile since he put 2 in a row together. Last was one of those “looked better than it really was” races as the pace collapsed even more than usual on synth.
SB-never tried this surface and everything I read said he didn’t look near as efficient moving over the track as he did earlier this year on dirt. Doubt if you’ll see him on synthetic again.
TO-Never raced on anything but turf. Zero all weather experience.
RK-won an optional claimer at Laurel to start the year, went West and flourished on the surface. Looked over the top coming in and another out of the Goodwood; the winner of that didn’t even run in the Classic.
GP-He’s a very good turf horse. Tried the poly once this year and ran fifth.
Einstein-Very versatile horse who was “shuffled back after steadying sharply and was never close thereafter”
Girolamo-3 year raced in an Aoc in September, no experience on synthetic and never tried any of the big 3 year olds. Why was he even here?
RVW-turf horse, no all weather experience, and had a bad foot. Shouldn’t have even raced.
RR-tried this surface last year and stopped. No chance on this track with his running style.
QR-disliked the track so much he wouldn’t even get in the gate.
AG-won the Hawthorne GC in the mud and an allowance race at Hol on the turf. 1-12 on all weather and I’m not sure if he’s ever raced on Pro Ride. A real stretch.
I\'m just sayin...