Strike Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> P-Dub Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Edgorman Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Race callers don\'t identify horses by saddle
> > cloth
> > > colors.
> > > They memorize the silks worn by the jocks.
> > > I\'m not a fan of Collmus, but I think it is a
> > very
> > > difficult profession.
> >
> > I\'m aware they identify silks, its easier to
> see
> > than saddle cloths which are often obstructed.
> >
> > However, going down the stretch, anyone
> watching
> > could clearly see the bright blue saddle cloth.
>
> For those of us in the color-blind club the #3
> (number) was pretty obvious as well. Collmus must
> have been looking at the numbers -- saddle cloths
> were so different -- white/bright blue. #3 was on
> the rail and the #2 was 5 wide. He realized his
> mistake when announcing the show horse who he just
> called as the place horse. Not piling on. I feel
> sorry for the guy. His pre-race handicapping
> probably got in the way not thinking an 81-1 would
> make the outcome close. Both horses were also
> moving from behind.
Except, again, announcers identify the horses by silks, not numbers or saddlecloths. Nothing to do with color blind or pre-race handicapping. Dirty and similar silks and a horse sneaking up the rail and he screwed up. He owned up to it. Life goes on.