You are right to a certain extent,no doubt, but I never miss & rarely have much bad to say about Sar, & this yr was the 1st one in 3 or 4 that I ended up on the plus side at the end. Imo, the gambling at CD is usually even better than it is this fall at Kee because of all the overflow claiming races. If you get that kind of race right, & there are usually many different approaches, you get paid off. The flip side, of course, is that the chance of pitching a shutout, which I did for the best card of the meet Fri, is much greater. I\'ve seen & appreciated more than my fair share of the great ones over the yrs, but playing this game the way I think it should be played, & the only way I\'m interested in playing it in any event, requires big, competitive fields. That is what I think Kee has been offering this fall, along with what I also think, notwithstanding Mr Chance\'s opinion to the contrary, is as close to drug free racing as there has been anywhere in quite some time. In addition to the way Lori Wydick is riding,the real stories this meet so far have been how the horses of some of the suspected drug trainers can\'t seem to finish the way their horses usually do, & how poorly many of the \"expert\" handicappers are doing, now that recognizing a supertrainer\'s name in the program is no longer enough. Sort of reminds me of what happened to a lot of stock market \"experts\" at the end of a the last bull market.
