Chuckles,
If you are not able to follow our dialog on this thread, I can help you with explaining my part. It is not my fault that your part is moronic.
Anyway, to recap,
1 -- SPA wrote one line about a live 50-1 shot.
2 -- You shot down SPA with a barrage of verbiage that distills to -- the horse is too slow and poorly trained.
3 -- I responded, maybe he is too slow, but he is not poorly trained.
4 -- Your response to me was incomprehensible.
5 -- I explained that your response was incomprehensible.
6 -- You wrote an even more incomprehensible response.
7 -- I responded to your even more incomprehensible response.
8 -- You ignored item 7.
9 -- Spa posts again that 50-1 is real and a great price.
10 -- I review the sheets and agree that the horse is great value at 50-1. Having actually analyzed the race, I realized that your analysis here, which was covered with a veneer of sophistication, was really a potemkin village -- no there there. Since I ignore most of what you write on other threads, I mused that if your other verbiage is as two-bit as what you have written on this thread, then it aint worth a bucket of warm spit.
11 -- You accuse me of not making sense and distracting you.
Listen, dude, you cannot have it both ways. You cannot simply have diarrhea of the key board all the time whenever you feel like and then, on the other hand, get all upset if somebody actually responds to what you write. As they say, if you can\'t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. Oops, I guess you already did.
SCM2