Did anyone analyze this and come up with the conclusion the 4 would go off 0.8-1 and win, and the 5 at 1.9-1 finishing second? I saw both of these as bet againsts--the 4 did not seem clearly faster than the others, Clement had finished 3rd twice in a row in this race at <2-1 odds, and the 5 had a break in workouts and had a bouncy pattern--but the 5 did have two previous tops very solid in this field. Any comments/insight appreciated. Thanks.
