>Belmont is where I would have more concerns with Super Saver and Borel as he >hasn\'t had much success there (0 for 5 lifetime, MTB stands out) and that >track\'s size is uniquely different than most others.
>If Super Saver wins the Preakness, I hope Calvin has enough sense to spend a >week or two in New York or atleast take a few mounts on the Belmont undercard >this year, like he didn\'t do last year.
Totally agree, sekrah. Borel is great at tracks configured like Churchill (that he knows like the palm of his hand) and Pimlico. He may have not had much formal education but he is brilliant at calculating how much the tiring horse ahead of him will drift from the rail on the those tight turns and how much horse he has to get through that opening.
Belmont is a whole different ball of wax. Horses are less likely to drift on those wide sweeping turns and saving ground is not as important there as well.
Most importantly, Big Sandy is different from all other U.S. tracks in terms of relation of the location of the furlong markers to the turns. That\'s why so many riders that haven\'t ridden there much, often miss-time their move, including Calvin, who was so overconfident last year with Mine That Bird that he didn\'t bother to ride a single race prior to Belmont day. Kent D, who had learned this same lesson the hard way on Real Quiet, said \"Calvin is naive on these matters\", before going out and beating him with a well-timed ride on Summer Bird.
Bob