Thx for clarifying that, I see what you are saying since the number of starts on the win% side is far more than the number of starts evaluated for the top-pair-off-x side for the same stat (like last 90 days)
Interestingly, I just located Ness\'s profile on some Saturday sheets as well. His Last 90 days stats show new top of 13% and pair of 21% in 108 starts, similar sample size. And remember, Maker\'s was 40% and 25% for almost the same sample size.
For the laughably ridiculous argument made that Maker is just \"dropping his horses into places they will do well\", it is interesting that Ness\'s stats (like you said, if accurate) suggest that he ACTUALLY IS playing the claiming game well, spotting horses in places they will win despite not having a huge % of new tops/pairs.