I think it is also worth noting the time frame that sample size covers as well. For example, that study on TAP that was posted a few days ago made the conclusion that Pletcher\'s most productive pattern Derby wise, has been the top two back, followed by a bounce. I believe the poster referenced Bluegrass Cat and Invisible Ink as examples. Tough to make bets or predictions off of that when those occurred in 2001 and 2006. I would assume in 16 years, as many Derby starters as TAP has had, he would not be doing things EXACTLY the same now as he did back then (shipping, workouts, different drug rules etc). If we are looking at a general study of patterns on a cross section of different horses, ok, I get it, but when dealing with one guy only, I am not using a horse who ran 16 years ago as a definitive data point to state my case....and if I had to go back that far, I wouldnt be feeling that confident.