rotw

[mandown]

Lucy,

That\'s really quite a funny post. You say that you don\'t remember \'making any claim that one analysis was \'so superior\' to another\' and then proceed to praise Len\'s and denigrate TG\'s. Maybe you didn\'t say it but I was obviously right to imply it.

You\'re also confusing the rotw - a learning tool for clients - with a betting strategy.

I agree with you both boards should promote their own products not attack the opposition\'s. I\'ve had many \'debates\' with Jerry over that. But the simple fact is that the other board allows frequent, baseless and libellous attacks on Jerry and myself. If that\'s the game then I\'m happy to play it.

If you\'re ever on a UK racetrack ask the bookmakers where they make their money. The answer will be opposing bad favourites. Jerry and professional backers do the same thing. Len did it in the Whitney by labelling Peace Rules a play against at his forecast ML. Maybe you should show us where we\'re all going wrong.

Cheers,

George

[Lucy]

\"But the simple fact is that the other board allows frequent, baseless and libellous attacks on Jerry and myself. \"


hehehe...
oh, and you think you\'ve got a handle on irony...?

ps

I should probably add that most of the stuff w/jerry\'s name in it gets deleted over there, and most of what\'s left is posted by one particular individual who flourished in this greenhouse until he and jerry had some kind of falling out, and he was banned.