My understanding is a figure is a figure. The 3 consecutive neg 3 1/4\'s are impressive, and there is no adjustment for a \"favorable scenario\". Everything is already factored into the figure-ie, was he wide, carrying more weight, start slow, taken up, etc. However, if the horse won while being eased up, or ran on a dead rail, the sheet tells us that (!, or X to the right of the figure) also. My point is that I don\'t think we should start adjusting the figures based on what someone may think is a favorable scenario. the figure is the figure.