G-Men

[Topcat]

drbillym Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey Frank, everyone I talk to thinks OVER, citing
> the potent passing of both quaterbacks and the
> indoor playing field preventing any weather
> related problems.  So why has the line dropped
> from 55 1/2 to 54?  Smells like under is the play.


A couple of the more influential public information disseminators I\'m aware of prefer the under.  And the marketmakers can say they ignore all touts in their machinations, but they\'re not being straight with the public when they say that.

[HP]

Dr. - if this is true then the little guys won that year.  Giants 20, Bills 19.  You must be thinking of another game.  

HP

[miff]

Must have meant 1987 Giants were minus- 9.5 against Denver and won 39-20.

In 1991 the Giants were plus + 7 against the Bills and won 20-19.

[drbillym]

Yes, Miff, thx for the clarification, I did mean the Denver game.

[RICH]

1987

Still think about that one, where I had 0-0 for a final finish for 5k, and was counting my money with a few seconds left when allegre shanked the extra point. Something you never forget when you 26 yrs old.