Author Topic: Judging by the first...  (Read 964 times)

Lost Cause

  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
Judging by the first...
« on: May 03, 2013, 09:34:13 AM »
The rail didn\'t look too good..4/5 fave coming up the inside looked like he was rnning in quicksand struggling to close..or am I seeing things

badride123

  • Posts: 41
    • View Profile
Re: Judging by the first...
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2013, 09:36:18 AM »
Its Lanerie for Vickey Oliver, you may want to hold judgement.  Whoever goes down on that thing at 4-5 pshew, lawd

Lost Cause

  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
Re: Judging by the first...
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2013, 09:44:35 AM »
badride123 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Its Lanerie for Vickey Oliver, you may want to
> hold judgement.  Whoever goes down on that thing
> at 4-5 pshew, lawd


Just observing...needed the 3 to beat him for third for the tri so I was watching him and hoping..he looked like he was ready to roll at the top of the stretch but when he got inside instead of out just looked like he sputtered..did you see anything there, trying to form some opinions..

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Judging by the first...
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2013, 09:50:06 AM »
It\'s early, but something to watch.
TGJB

badride123

  • Posts: 41
    • View Profile
Re: Judging by the first...
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2013, 09:52:25 AM »
I thought VF chalk was away slow.  Thought that was a really bad race, but fairly run.  It was completely devoid of speed less Mott, and that Mott was really a crow.   I do have a pretty good opinion on Mcpeek here in the second.  Im pressing to win, and using with 5.7.8.10 under and over in Exactas.  

Maybe get a better feel for the surface through the next couple of races.   Real legit pace here in 2nd.   GL