Very poorly written article. Is TGJB the inventor of the Bounce theory? If so, Simon should have used TG figures to address his hypothesis rahte than Beyer and Brisnet numbers.
It seems to me that the term \"Bounce\" is improperly overused. When reviewing the bounce pattern in the Introductory section, it is very clearly illustrated. Those obvious patterns don\'t seem to come up that often. And I don\'t see a reference to the time involved, so perhaps it is a good time for JB or others to expand on this.
And bouncing is not the same as moving backwards. Jimbo66 laid 2-1 that Oxbow would move backwards in the Preakness, but I don\'t see how going from a 1-5-5 supported this projection.
Look forward to JB and others clarifying the bounce theory.