Dana666 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not sure what the number would be, but visually it
> seemed to me that he bounced badly. He was lucky
> to win, shows he\'s got some guts, too. He went way
> too fast early, he\'s never been that rank before
> (that\'s not a good sign at all), and he really had
> to dig down late. It will be very interesting to
> see what happens from here. Can\'t say I was very
> impressed with that race, but then again, the mark
> of a good horse is he wins even when it\'s not his
> best day, and that sure wasn\'t his best day. Was
> that track very slow???
This is also going to be a very interesting day for figure assignment. The track rating changed from Fast to Good to Fast again. This was a day when there appeared to be distinct surface speed fluctuation. Overall, the times were not sharp and the track was certainly not Glib, but the Southwest Stakes on raw time was simply pedestrian. It\'s why I\'m here today. Very confusing.
Found this blurb in the Online Daily Racing Form:
\"We wanted to get away from the field if we possibly could and pick the part of the racetrack we wanted to be in,\" said Bob Holthus, who trains Lawyer Ron:
http://www.drf.com/news/article/72440.htmlApparently, there were path issues. At least per Holthus.