Thats the whole problem Alm. Pyro has not gotten 9 poles. And in the 8.5 events he wasn\'t beating much and wasn\'t earning much of figure. (I toss the Monmouth slop number that Beyer says was \"legit\". Right, legit alright, (whatever that means), I like to bet him on the probability of a repeat.
I was told Pyro was gimping around in the days before his Churchill work, but on work day (Scalding 49:4) the gimpiness seemed to depart. Interesting isn\'t it?
Add those concerns to trying to close into a less than rapid pace through a maze of traffic and I think you need about 12-1 before you begin to think exotics. With the recent good showings he may go off that. He may be second choice. I really don\'t have a clue what the crowd will do with this one, but in my book, he should be 15-1, but I doubt he will be.
alm Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It\'s one thing to be able to deduce a horse will
> sprint or route...or will run one turn or two...or
> can stay on to 12 panels as opposed to 8...IMHO it
> is not possible at all to be able to predict that
> a young 3yo horse has a 9 panel ability as opposed
> to a 10 panel ability.
>
> Besides which, TG numbers are intended to predict
> what level of achievement a horse might make based
> on its past and recent form. That\'s their value
> and that\'s what their success is based upon.
>
> Chances are a horse like Pyro can get 10 panels if
> he can get 9 and, if his TG numbers say he is in
> the hunt, you need to judge where his achievement
> level will be Saturday...that\'s all.
>
> Factor in that his trainer is hip to the gig and
> is no damn fool. He prepped this horse the way he
> did for a reason. This may not be the winner, but
> this is a legitimate contender. I learned my
> lesson with Curlin and it\'s my guess that Asmussen
> did too.