Paul, the point I was trying to make is that ... whatever the number is, 5% or whatever ... that many of that other 95% earned their championships over the course of the year and would have won their divisions even if they lost in the BC. Yes, they won in the BC because they were the best horse. But many of that 95% already proved they were the best in their division, and would have won even if they lost in the BC (or didn\'t show up, for whatever reason). So, the point was meant to extend beyond that 5%. Sorry if that was unclear.