I just realized something looking at MofH\'s sheet. He has basically the same pattern as the one Astrology had heading into the Preakness. And almost the same #\'s too. Got to a 6.75 as a two year old (Astrology 6.25). Both opened up with 4.5\'s in late first start\'s at 3, then ran a tiny bit better in their 2nd starts. And then Astrology did indeed run well in the Preakness, losing by 2 lengths.
If we assume that Master of Hounds handles dirt, which he did in the Derby, he now has every right for the same improvement and his pattern looks good for an a new top. He is slower coming in, but so was Astrology.
Plus, he certainly has experience shipping, as his last three have all involved huge distances.
Only problem I see is that Astrology was 15:1 in the Preakness (and higher than that ante post), whereas It\'s hard to imagine MofH\'s being that price in the Belmont. Plus assuming Nehro makes the race along with both of the other big 2 (which may not be such a good assumption mind you...would not surprise me at all to see Motion rule out AK), the field in the Belmont is at least as tough.
MofH\'s probably would need to jump to a 0 to win. On a positive note, you would think Gomez will keep the mount.
20:1 I\'m all over him
15:1 I like him a bit
10:1 no thanks.