jimbo66 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hate to detract from the long intellectual
> debate about weight and its effect on horses, but
> if you remember the original point being made at
> the beginning of the thread, it was Larry Jones
> whining about spotting Blind Luck 2 pounds.
>
> To my mind, Blind Luck continuing to be campaigned
> so ambitiously by her connections, shipping
> anywhere, anytime and crossing the country AGAIN
> to face Havre de Grace on Havre de Grace\'s home
> track where she steamrolled \"tin cans\" in her prep
> for the Delaware Cap, was a bigger impediment than
> the 2 pounds. Nope, I can\'t justify it, quantify
> it, or prove it scientifically, but Havre de
> Grace, was on her home track, had a tactical edge
> in a short field and couldn\'t hold off Blind Luck.
> Larry Jones\' filly (who is excellent) was beat,
> on the square, IMO, by a top class filly (also
> excellent) who seems to be able to run her race
> anywhere.
>
> And \"yes\", the connections of Blind Luck deserve
> so much credit for their willingness to run her
> all over the country and take on all comers. A
> start contrast to some recent high profile
> connections.........
>
> The best horse won on Saturday, 2 pounds or not.
So you just dismiss BL\'s lost to HDG by over 3 lengths as if it didn\'t happen? And BL\'s loss by a similar margin 2 other times this year?
Just curious why you think that BL winning this one by a nose while in receipt of 2 pounds means the better horse won but you don\'t think the better horse won by 3 lengths when at even weights or the better horse beat BL twice out in California, BL\'s backyard?