VP,
I wanted to get back to you on your question.
There are obviously alot of factors involved but I would say 3 things
1) no, I would not play a horse that doesn\'t \"look good\" with a very nice pattern as long as I am making that judgement for myself and not trusting someone else. I can live with my own error in judgement, I can\'t live with someone else\'s so if I like a horse, I tend to ignore most of the noise around the horse but if I have a chance to see a horse myself and form an opinion, I might eliminate that horse based on a physical
2) I would not rule a horse that isn\'t \"moving well\" as I have said a number of times on the board because vets can do alot of legal things to help a horse move better (I always use the Ice Box example) but I will absolutely rule out a horse that is as small and light as Normandy Invasion given his running style and the size of the field
3) If it was a small field, I would have no problem with his size or if he was a more forwardly placed horse, I wouldn\'t have a big problem with him but, just guessing, I would say Normandy Invasion weighs at least 100 pds less than the average horse in the Ky. Derby. I just don\'t see any way he makes it through from the back of the pack without getting bumped and jostled many times and if he encounters any kind of bumping at all, he\'s going to get impacted by that given how light he is.
can he win? sure he can, any of them can as a 20 horse field can and often does produce chaos and I think he\'s a nice horse who could be really good in a race like the Belmont as I have said on the board before but I am looking for reasons to eliminate horses when I think about this race and I will eliminate a very small closer in a 20 horse field everytime and live with it if I am wrong
hope this helps