Author Topic: Game on Dude  (Read 1369 times)

Silver Charm

  • Posts: 4644
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2014, 07:24:20 PM »
A Mile in 1:31:02.....wtf. This wasn\'t a shock that he went off at this price. I believe I said 7/2. He showed up today. Congrats to the connections. I passed the race and rooted for WTC!

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2014, 07:31:21 PM »
That fraction is out of whack with the rest. Saws lost the race early when wide for no reason.
TGJB

TreadHead

  • Posts: 633
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2014, 07:32:43 PM »
the fraction was magically corrected to 132.57 by the time the prices were posted, but this is still nearly a full second faster than the track record at a mile.

EDIT - LOOL and Trackus says 133.31.

Lost Cause

  • Posts: 1166
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2014, 08:21:38 PM »
TGJB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That fraction is out of whack with the rest. Saws
> lost the race early when wide for no reason.


absolutely..it looks like all he was worried about was keeping MMM close and on his inside at any cost..still got to give it to GOD for the very nice performance rewarding his fans..great race although MMM did not run his..this is what racing is all about...best against the best..

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2014, 09:11:57 PM »
Trakus had it 1.33.1.WTC huge sucker makes his living mostly out in clear not inside eating dirt
miff

jimbo66

  • Posts: 2307
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2014, 10:31:17 PM »
Saez easily one of the worst big name jockeys with ground loss and unnecessarily going wide.

That said, he didn\'t cost WTC the race.  Game on dude much the best.   Took it right to this field.  Shook off a stupid early attack by Rosario.  Put away mucho macho on the turn and easily held WTC at bay late.  Kudos to him

Jim

siphonbobby

  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2014, 11:01:23 PM »
He ran a good race but IMO it was aided by a inside bias on the dirt track. Its been that way all week

Niall

  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude - Andy Serling
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2014, 11:12:02 PM »
Did anyone catch the FoxSP1 broadcast? It took some convincing to put that channel on again after watching my Johnnies earlier in the day vs. Marquette, but I did. Andy could not have been more emphatic is his selection of GOD. I have never seen this before... has anyone else? Thats backing your horse!! Right on Andy! Anyway, I digress and have an interesting take on the 4th at Aqu. Read the DRF analysis ... the work being given to really b cat is not his, but it is going to affect the pool ... Can someone tell me should I have used the A in affect or the E? I never get that right ... Great racing today! Agreed?

jimbo66

  • Posts: 2307
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude - Andy Serling
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2014, 12:20:37 AM »
Niall,

Yes, you are right to to hyperbolize.  I also can\'t believe Serling picked a winner.  Can the apocalypse be far behind?

Oh, wait a minute, he boxed game on dude and mucho macho man.  Not sure that counts as a \"winner\".....

Jim

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: Game on Dude
« Reply #24 on: March 10, 2014, 04:07:23 PM »
Jimbo-- WTC earned a much better figure than the winner, and Saez had the option of being on the rail on the first turn if he took back a little. You can take from that what you will.
TGJB