sekrah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ahh yes. Here comes the West Coast \"chip on my
> shoulder\" rant from P-Dub.
>
> P-Dub, Quite frankly nobody gives a @#$%& where
> Chrome is from and if you think so you are
> delusional. I\'ll bet against Derby winners in the
> Preakness, and horses going for the Triple Crown
> in the Belmont EVERYTIME. I don\'t give a f- where
> they are from. Why? Because they are underlays.
>
> If he wins he wins, Wonderful. Doesn\'t change the
> fact that he\'s been an underlay in every Triple
> Crown race so far and will be so in the Belmont as
> well.
>
> Save this \"No Respect\" nonsense for your Chrome
> Facebook fanboy page. We\'re here to make money.
> If an underlay gets us, oh well. It\'s happened
> before and it\'ll happen again. Part of the game.
I don\'t know where you\'re from, nor do I care. Wasn\'t a \"west coast\" chip on my shoulder rant. You missed the point, thats what happens when you rage on like you just did. Calm down son, lighten up with the expletives, and try to do a better job comprehending a post.
My point was that there were plenty of excuses people gave as to why he won. Perfect trip, traffic for others. He\'s lucky, he\'s not much faster than others.
The fact that he has tactical speed, is tractable, is a big reason he has won the 1st 2 legs. That\'s not luck.
I gave an example of a \"slower\" horse, with the same type of tactical speed, that beat his supposed \"faster\" opponent.
I also never said betting against favorites is a bad thing, yet you went on and on about betting against underlays. Yet I was ranting??
You were in such a hurry to defend your \"big black bag filled to the top\" wager, that you got all lathered up.
I didn\'t bet a dime on the Preakness, because I didn\'t see the horse losing. I\'ll take a swing in the Belmont, against my beloved West Coast horse. I may have tears in my eyes as I place the wager, I\'m such a homer.
As Sgt Hulka said.....\"lighten up, Francis\".