3
« on: May 16, 2013, 08:21:29 AM »
Pizza - A few win pools:
2012 Kentucky Derby - 52,626,628
2012 Preakness - 20,136,607
2012 Belmont - 20,544,942
2012 BC Classic - 6,086,509
2013 Kentucky Oaks - 4,786,114
2013 Kentucky Derby - 56,864,011
Next highest win pool on Derby Day (Race 9) = 3,014,097
There are two explanations I would think. Either regular players bet around nine times as much on the Derby as the Breeders Cup (and three times as much on the other Triple Crown races) or the Triple Crown pools are significantly swelled by casual players.
The reason Jerry\'s explanation makes perfect sense is that it is the way casual players bet. To them there is no value getting 2-1 about a true 7-5 shot for their $10. What\'s the point they think? It barely buys a round of drinks let alone dinner.
Whether it seems logical to you or not most casual players see the money they bet as money spent, i.e. they almost expect to lose. So their \'reasoning\' is that if they have little chance of winning they might just as well try to win big.
And the reason they are \'uninformed\' is because they (a) can\'t see the point in handicapping as \'everybody knows you can\'t win at betting on horses\' and (b) they don\'t want to make the effort anyway. All they want is the \'buzz\' of thinking they might be a winner and the bigger the better.
Regular players may play percentages but casual players do not. It\'s the same with casinos. You\'ll find more people playing slots (random) than table games (an element of skill).
The attraction for regular players is that the Triple Crown (particularly the Derby) gets some people away from the slots and into the racebooks. It might also be interesting to see if lottery pools are down during Derby week.
In the end I think a psychologist is better qualified to explain Derby odds than a mathematician.