I was actually talking about the breeding of Asiatic Boy and I really only study it back 3 generations and note the roots of the fourth, beyond that it\'s interesting, but a little less likely ancient lighting in a bottle is gonna strike again. Others say the whole breeding angle is hogwash. I think it has its place, you just have to know when to use it.
On another note, slow is slow unless you\'re factoring Poly. But Slow early on Poly is as much as a figure deflater as Slow early on Dirt and you can\'t run real fast late to make up for too slow early. Pyro finished like a horse with potential, but he ran a slow number and you can\'t hand him his most honestly made figure just because he won by 3 and had earned a fast number before. It doesn\'t work like that.
The filly would have kicked his ass.
marcus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fractional time\'s in the Risen Star may also imo
> have been the result of a slow playing surface for
> that race and in \"theory\" , horses likely would
> have otherwise been more strung out thusly
> rendering Pyro\'s overland route unnecessary .
>
> After following Chucks query all the way back , i
> did see his point about proximate\"old blood\" lines
> for Grasshopper but what distances and type of
> tracks did they have back then ( at Stonehinge
> Downs ) ...