Please Richie, you had your mind made up that you were coming at me. You don\'t go out of your way to look up someone\'s lifetime stats and calculate their win percentage and then respond with it as your first line, for no reason. Your tone was \"your stat was wrong so your thesis was wrong.....look at my stat, I proved you wrong, Im so smart\". Like I said, let me know how him being a 13% trainer as opposed to 8% makes my conclusion any less viable. So wait, he is 13% now so these results are consistent and in line with the norm? Please stop. And I offered way more than \"one wrong stat\". I mentioned abnormal performance and betting patterns, not to mention the prescence of usual ice cold Spa trainers having very similar type activity and results as my logic. Youre asking questions about horses first off the claim and his stats in that category. That\'s irrelevant. This horse wasnt off the claim. It\'s horses he has had, running abnormal performances combined with suspicious betting. That\'s a huge red flag. It\'s not one wrong stat.
I know Matthew Schera......and that wasnt his horse. Greyjoy is owned by a lawyer and this is his only horse. Like I said, Im worried about my bottom line, the health of the game and the health of the horses (both my own and otherwise). It seems like you are just worried about trying to be right and coming off smarter than everyone else so you can feel good about yourself. Again, that can go in a different thread than this one. Your response brought nothing to the thread other than the \"hey look at me\" tone of correcting a stat and then ripping my argument because of it.
If you want to be snotty and criticize red boarders or bad beat complainers, just so you can feel good, that\'s your business, but if you\'re going to come at me like a know it all and put that trash in one of my threads, bring a little more meat then the \"Your stat was a few % pts wrong, so you must be an idiot\" garbage from today. I assure you sir, Im no idiot, particularly when it\'s matters like these.
