Bull:
I do not care to go back and forth. But of course I will.
I was not \"correcting\" you. I am not trying to discourage you from bringing
forward your theory. What I am encouraging you to do, for my education and to
bolster your claim, is to supplement your theory with facts and statistics.
The reason I suggested using TG trainer stats is because this is the TG board. I
was looking too see if there was something other than his near 30% strike rate at
Saratoga that points to his runners moving up.
\"Horses he has had, running abnormal performances, combined with suspicious
betting\", would love to hear about it. And I agree that if a horse is
\"rebreaking\" under Jackie Davis, that has a certain February feel to it. But
really, Bull, without getting insulted, what is \"abnormal?\" Big lifetime top?
All of a sudden showing gate speed, where none was shown before? Speed in morning
workouts where none was shown before?
The whole notion of \"what I said to you and why I said it\", all of your
comments about how I treat other posters, I won\'t respond to that. I will
however, say that I did not set my mind to \"come at you\". When you threw out the
\"habitual 8%\" stat, it sounded wrong to me, so I checked it.
Coming at you? No. Asking you to do better? Yes. And for the love of Mike, it is
not personal with me.