Counterpoint
To begin with, I think the analysis product is useful. Further, the one in question a satisfactory example imo. My disclaimer is as I mentioned about the AQ no inquiry race I relate conceptually and not so much to a specific detail of two. However, like any product it is only useful if it solves the customer\'s problem. That is... when it satisfies a user\'s needs so to speak. I wasn\'t the customer in this case! WrongWay & Strike were.
Like most of the readers herein I\'ve been thru the phase of doubting the analysis. I got over doubt with experience which led me to a greater perspective.
But to the essential disconnect - In the case of a mis-communication whose responsibility is it to relate to the message with understanding? I have this issue nearly every day. My wife and I realize we have a mis-communication but can\'t determine whether the cause is with the msg sender or receiver or?.
I have no desire to resist the WrongWay post in any way. I can only acknowledge what I perceive to be his disappointment. His dissatisfaction may be more literal than I can appreciate? An example of mis-understanding at its best follows: From Race #1 of the same DMR analysis.
Rosarita is erratic & takes steep class drop.
Avoid. Audra to win @ 5-1 & up.
3H box w/Mudge/Altaira. B
Audra went off at a useless 8/1. The Rosarita/Mudge exacta paid $38/1 for a plus 33 units after one race. My profit objective achieved I\'m out of here missing the exactas in the 2nd, 5th and 8th along with other winner(s).
I\'ve come to realize the meaning of my communication is the response that it gets. I\'ve also learned that my wife and I don\'t speak the same language but that doesn\'t keep us from getting along just fine. For me, if something doesn\'t make sense I know it is because I\'m missing information.
