First of all, let\'s talk nicknames. When I hit the Ragozin office at the ripe old age of 20, I was The Kid for a while. Then Cauthen came along, and he was The Kid, and I wasn\'t. Now you. Write your own material.
When I go up to Saratoga, or leave the office in general, I am looking to get away from stress, not find more-- that\'s the main reason I don\'t enter handicapping contests, other than ones I can play from my desk while working. Anyway, I see no reason to give a seminar when I can be nursing a hangover instead.
On a quasi-related note, they tell me the DVD of the Vegas Expo is done. I\'ll definitely need a drink to watch that one.
The elements you mention (along with some others) certainly do make figure making difficult, but I think if you saw how tight the data base is (which you can only see by working with it, not by betting with it), you would see it\'s not impossible.
There is a very important distinction to be made between Friedman\'s position and mine about Snookie boy. On Ragozin, it didn\'t matter whether he bounced or not-- he was too slow, and had absolutely no shot. On ours, at the weights and figuring for ground saved from the rail, he was one of the very fastest horses in the race if he ran his race. In my play for the race-- both my own and the analysis-- I was playing Pies Prospect to run a 1. That meant that the horses I was going to protect under were the ones that could beat him if he ran his race, and realistically there were only 4-- LH (by far the most likely), RHT, MSB, and Tap Day. My play in the analysis (and the bulk of my own play) was a win bet, a big exacta under LH (my best result), and tris LH/RHT, MSB, TD/Pies Prospect. If you used just Ragozin, you absolutely could not have used MSB, and would not have hit the race.
I\'ll be at Saratoga that weekend. Should be sitting in sec J row D, and I\'ll undoubtedly be at Siro\'s at some point.