Author Topic: War of Will  (Read 2022 times)

hellersorr

  • Posts: 336
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #45 on: May 04, 2019, 07:33:53 PM »
T Severini Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
 
> Just got extremely busy. Hot because that was a
> tough beat, I used Motts horses and liked Shug
> too.


Stop being so modest.  You private messaged me just before the race with the EXACT order of finish of all 19 horses.

Incredible!  I am in awe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

T Severini

  • Posts: 390
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #46 on: May 04, 2019, 07:38:14 PM »
At Equibase they still haven\'t put the chart up. That tells you the craft going into this one.


dcost328 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Exactly your points, Frank.
>
> A flagrant foul is going to draw a stewards
> inquiry regardless, and it didn\'t.
>
> A flagrant foul against you is going to draw an
> objection from the jock who was impeded against.
> It wasn\'t.
>
> Those are facts.
>
> I don\'t know how after these 2 facts, you take a
> look after an objection by a horse that was not
> even bothered and was handily beaten.
>
> The only other side of the coin is people who have
> something against Servis or who took a stand
> against this horse completely and were just flat
> out wrong in thinking he couldn\'t get it done.

alydar61

  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #47 on: May 04, 2019, 07:44:03 PM »
We may not have to wait for that to happen, the way things are going.

JR

  • Posts: 594
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #48 on: May 04, 2019, 07:51:39 PM »
So you believe War of Will’s chances of a better placing were not compromised?
JR

dcost328

  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #49 on: May 04, 2019, 07:54:11 PM »
That question only needs be asked of Tyler Gaffalione, and he already answered it resoundingly.

JR

  • Posts: 594
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #50 on: May 04, 2019, 07:54:31 PM »
And now it’s off to Pimlico, or at least half of it. Perfect flower for that race. Black-eyed Susans.
JR

JR

  • Posts: 594
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #51 on: May 04, 2019, 07:55:09 PM »
I didn’t hear what he said. What did he say?
JR

dcost328

  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #52 on: May 04, 2019, 07:56:57 PM »
That\'s the point.

sekrah

  • Posts: 1802
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #53 on: May 04, 2019, 08:00:13 PM »
He\'s 24 years old in his second Derby.  The kid shit his pants.  It happens.

Roman

  • Posts: 602
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #54 on: May 04, 2019, 08:01:50 PM »
What is the rule, any statement from the stewards yet?
If floating out a couple of paths is an infraction, why wasn’t Scrappy T disqualified in the Preakness, he kept his second place placing.

JR

  • Posts: 594
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #55 on: May 04, 2019, 08:03:08 PM »
That wasn’t floating a horse wide. The was impeding a horse.
JR

sekrah

  • Posts: 1802
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #56 on: May 04, 2019, 08:03:38 PM »
Roman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is the rule, any statement from the stewards
> yet?
> If floating out a couple of paths is an
> infraction, why wasn’t Scrappy T disqualified in
> the Preakness, he kept his second place placing.


Because Afleet Alex won, no placing was affected by it. If Afleet Alex would have went down, Scrappy T would have been DQ\'d.

T Severini

  • Posts: 390
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #57 on: May 04, 2019, 08:05:30 PM »
When the review took as long as it did without an inquiry and the two \"Most\" inmpacted horses clearly not having their placing affected...you knew the explanation was going to be crafted.  Its gonna be a beaut.  

Roman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is the rule, any statement from the stewards
> yet?
> If floating out a couple of paths is an
> infraction, why wasn’t Scrappy T disqualified in
> the Preakness, he kept his second place placing.

Roman

  • Posts: 602
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #58 on: May 04, 2019, 08:07:22 PM »
But he impeded the horse, should of been placed last according to this ruling.
Need more uniformity.
Bayern, Maximum Security, racing’s biggest stage.
Should not have to be this difficult of a subject.
The slo motion replay I think makes it worse than it was.

sekrah

  • Posts: 1802
    • View Profile
Re: War of Will
« Reply #59 on: May 04, 2019, 08:08:06 PM »
Umm.. Long Range Toddy lost all kinds of placing from this. Did you watch something else?



T Severini Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When the review took as long as it did without an
> inquiry and the two \"Most\" inmpacted horses
> clearly not having their placing affected...you
> knew the explanation was going to be crafted.  Its
> gonna be a beaut.  
>
> Roman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > What is the rule, any statement from the
> stewards
> > yet?
> > If floating out a couple of paths is an
> > infraction, why wasn’t Scrappy T disqualified
> in
> > the Preakness, he kept his second place placing.