TGAB,
>But I have a question for Ch--what about the closers who are aren\'t necessarily affected by the pace?<
Somtimes closers are impacted by pace and sometimes they are not.
Somtimes the impact is favorable and sometimes it is negative.
If the pace is very slow, they are often strung out anyway because of the number of horses and run even slower than normal early. That can impact them negatively.
If the pace is slow for the first quarter and then gets extremely fast in the middle (which does happen from time to time), it will take a toll on the frontrunners. However, it can also take a toll on the closers that are trying to make their usual position improving move during the middle of part of the race. So even though they are off the pace, they are being used hard to get into contention, keep or improve their postion etc...
On the flip side, if the pace is extremely fast early and the middle slows down, when the closers do start their move (even though they will be further back than usual in terms of lengths) they will encounter less resistance than is typical when they do catch up because all the front runners are totally exhausted. That would tend to help them.
There is no hard fast formula for all this because all the horses are different (different levels of brilliance, stamina, acceleration, ability etc...) The impact is also not limited to quarters or to what is happening on the front end. It could be an 1/8. Different levels of ability between horses in the same exact race can also mean that the same exact fraction could be fast for one competitor in the race but easy for another.
If you think in terms of human athletes, use common sense, watch races very carefully to see who is being used hard, who is not and when etc.., have a good set of pace figures to supplement your visual skills (or study the fractions closely), you will feel like a blind man that can see. That\'s what happened to me at least. IMO, it often makes all the difference in the world when interpreting results.
Post Edited (03-12-05 15:44)