miff, someone said the expert horse watchers thought Smarty J\'s coat was looking ragged in his Keeneland works last year. He was working up a storm during that time per the posted works. The times were brilliant.
Who here has had a chance to watch Bellamania work? Nevertheless, they\'ve raved about his works at Churchill downs, but the times are not outstanding, regardless of \"Finally\" being pulled up. His best work at Churchill was April 3rd prior to the Wood. That 1.02.3 was not stellar.
If you go to Steve Haskins article about Bandini\'s last work he fawns all over him. But he does the same for many horses working that day.
http://tcm.bloodhorse.com/viewstory.asp?id=27920His words yesterday about Bellamania\'s last work were \"If you liked him, this work was impressive and won\'t discourage you.\" By all accounts it was a 1.00.2 He galloped out in 1.28 and 1.44 Unless you\'re there you can\'t see them, but figures and times aren\'t subjective. They tell their own story and if you use figures enough you can project the imagery without seeing. Theres better working horses at Churchill Downs.
TGJB, saying this in the third person is difficult, but there appears to be a horse in this field advantaged sufficiently by the variables (post excepted, track bias not considered) to win this race over half the time it is run. Figures, Pace, Form and likely position evaluated. The other horse that has a big chance is Bellamy on the probability that Tgraph is correct about the Wood and that he could freak and overcome the obstacles. The rest of the possible winners (5) have an estimated aggregate 20% chance. 13 horses have been eliminated as possible winners.
It may not hold up. Some seem to recall a statement in a recent ROTW that Between Consolidator and High Limit they aggregated a 75% chance to win the race. Because they didn\'t that doesn\'t mean they weren\'t well positioned to do so.