« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: ROTW  (Read 900 times)

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
ROTW
« on: October 21, 2005, 03:40:21 PM »
JB,

Is that 6 correct for Bird Harbor? Beyer has it 64( theres no real ground or weight isssue)I\'m tracking down the Rag Fig.Please confirm.
Logged
miff

davidrex

  • Posts: 548
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2005, 04:22:10 PM »


     Lets do some handicapping!
Even TVG has belabored speed on the \"golden rail\".
Early pace to the 1/4 pole would be a major factor.Any thoughts on who can get that rail?

Bird H. is a win bet at such odds. Is that the same jock from years ago? Trainer is well known by now..is the owner his usual customer? E/S...rail...back #...can discount race 2 back

Comacina has to be in my ticket.Speed,1st l.,Early lick.Great P.P.

Leave Me is easily fastest...last was maybe toooo long...love a 3yo. that runs substanial new top and improves big next out...good early...BAD post

Eyes is void of e/s...not for me

Simply is fast early...has bad post but his race 2 back is a thro/out for me, excuse and distance reason enough....t/p is coin flip...days back not encouraging

Hide & chic lacks e/s...has bad post...been bet hard last 6 starts...NAH!

Throwing the 1 around w/2-8-9-10

PARTYpokerON!

p.s. pace guys...need your help!...thanx

Logged

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2005, 04:24:02 PM »
Miff-- I just looked at the race, Suffolk is a track I don\'t do myself. It looks better adding 3 points. For the record, it won\'t keep me from betting the horse, though it would look better with the forward move.
Logged
TGJB

beyerguy

  • Posts: 331
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2005, 04:31:21 PM »
The link appears to be broken or the file missing for the ROTW at this time.
Logged

dodie

  • Posts: 272
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2005, 04:32:33 PM »
I get the \"this link cannot be found\" message too.
Logged

asfufh

  • Posts: 329
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2005, 04:33:54 PM »
may be an omen
Logged

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2005, 04:34:16 PM »
JB,

I do not follow Suffolk at all. My only interest is that KEE is playing inside speed and I might want to take a small shot. Thanks
Logged
miff

TGJB

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10868
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2005, 04:37:40 PM »
We\'re changing the ROTW because we are changing the Bird Harbor number, it will be back up in a few minutes.
Logged
TGJB

  • Guest
Re: ROTW
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2005, 04:41:05 PM »
miff,

Kee was sloppy today and the bias disappeared.
Logged

miff

  • Posts: 6008
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2005, 04:45:43 PM »
Thanks Class,

I was at Belmont for the first 5 races and did not see KEE simulcast. I was going by yesterday.
Logged
miff

J-DUB

  • Posts: 57
    • View Profile
Re: ROTW
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2005, 12:37:40 PM »

    Flying Glitter keeps on winning. I like that and the 8-1 with Albarado.
Logged
JW
Pages: [1]
« previous next »