Just thought some of you might want to know that those of us who have been debating the underlying assumptions in figure-making methodology, discussing the proper approach to take in statistical analysis, those of us who hold Ph.D\'s and other advanced degrees, are familiar with Six Sigma and other similar disciplines apparently are prepared to bash the work of other figure-makers in a biased fashion, wouldn\'t understand the arguments and issues involved in figure-making, and would not appreciate intelligent posts about these subjects from certain posters.
Who will spare us from further nonsense from this meddlesome poster?