Ask The Experts
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
SMF - Just Installed!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Ask The Experts
»
General Category
»
Ask the Experts
»
Fall Highweight
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Fall Highweight (Read 844 times)
Guest
Fall Highweight
«
on:
November 23, 2005, 06:13:07 PM »
What ever happened to the good old days when the top weight used to carry 140 lbs?
They should rename the race to the Fall Middleweight Handicap.
Logged
richiebee
Posts: 3465
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #1 on:
November 23, 2005, 06:30:00 PM »
Speed:
I would imagine some of the highweighted horses may have ended up in the DeFrancis race at Laurel or the Cigar Mile.
In any case, 11 horses all weighted between 123 and 127, should be a good betting race, no?
Logged
basket777
Posts: 170
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #2 on:
November 24, 2005, 09:36:00 AM »
And here comes Forego moving like a frieght train. Now that was a horse. Any place anytime. Any distance
Logged
Frank
Posts: 144
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #3 on:
November 24, 2005, 10:45:14 AM »
The best reason to tune into the Fall Highweight is the possibility of seeing Brown and Freidman settle their differences in the paddock at the big A. Racing meets pro wrestling. Think of the marketing opportunities, the story lines.
Happy Thanksgiving to all. Even though the real Thanksgiving is celebrated the first Monday in October. Better late than not at all.
Frank
Logged
miff
Posts: 6008
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #4 on:
November 24, 2005, 10:52:12 AM »
Basket,
According to Jerry, Forego wasn\'t fast enough to beat todays allowance horses.Brilliant!
Logged
miff
beyerguy
Posts: 331
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #5 on:
November 24, 2005, 11:45:34 AM »
miff,
To be honest, I don\'t care if horses are getting faster, but why would this be so troubling? Track athletes from Forego\'s time would be lucky to win at a decent college meet today. It doesn\'t make them any less great.
Logged
asfufh
Posts: 329
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #6 on:
November 24, 2005, 12:06:06 PM »
>>>\"What ever happened to the good old days when the top weight used to carry 140 lbs?
They should rename the race to the Fall Middleweight Handicap\"<<<
With the equipment now excluded from being counted in the \"official\" weights (varies by track!), they may actually be carrying 140+ lbs!
Logged
basket777
Posts: 170
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #7 on:
November 24, 2005, 01:02:17 PM »
None issue the future is my next bet. to me the numbers speack for themselves. i like to win. Once the horse crosses the finish line i\'m looking for the next chance to win.
Logged
miff
Posts: 6008
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #8 on:
November 24, 2005, 02:40:32 PM »
Beyerguy,
You are correct EXCEPT that horses are not bigger or stronger the way humans are now.From all the research I have done it seems that some people automatically thought that the horse followed all species and evolved accordingly.Not even close, as horses go.
Logged
miff
dcajero
Posts: 5
Re: Fall Highweight
«
Reply #9 on:
November 24, 2005, 03:13:03 PM »
Look at track photos of top horses from the 50\'s, 60\'s and 70\'s. Some of the older horses look like *yearlings* today. Horses are getting bigger faster and stronger and probably not through \'evolution\'.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Ask The Experts
»
General Category
»
Ask the Experts
»
Fall Highweight