Okay, Let's See

[Anonymous User]

You\'re a moron and you suck.

[Michael D.]

Scott,
Unfortunately my friend, the history books are in the process of revealing Clinton as a disgraced, failure of a president. You may want to send an email to the historians, not post here. As for Bush, you may want to email the 200 million Americans who think he is doing a great job......

So the NY races are washed out today, but I guess they are leaving the Hill Prince on the turf. Does this Deeliteful Guy horse have a shot? I liked him at first glance, but now it looks like the one who handles the soft turf will be best.

[Anonymous User]

I apologize about the hasty response. What I really meant to say is I wanna be your friend. Will you be my huckelberry? The BJ Billy got was from Paula Jones right?  And she just lied in court about her eagerness to give it and got cited for 100K worth of contempt by the judge correct?  And Billy settled the harassment at the workplace lawsuit with her because the lies he told to the Judge weren\'t goin to be admissable before a jury correct? His \"character\" lmfao, wasn\'t going to be directly impeachable from the pre-trial proceedings was it?  We won\'t get into the character asassination, destruction of evidence, use of state police as pimps and intimidation. You, best of friend of mine, are as big a moron as your idol. But I still love you.

lmfao

Tabitha

[Friendly]

It never ceases to amaze me that JB can write lies and twist facts and the faithful treat every word like it is the gospel. He is NOT telling the truth - that\'s why he isn\'t taking it any further in the legal system. He merely wants people to think there might be something amiss. So funny how the Graphies are manipulated by their savior.

Ragozin is never going to respond to it, but I\'ll be happy to show everyone his true colors.


Jerry, JR.

[Friendly]

For once Mike D and I agree on something. Clinton was the biggest joke of a President this country has ever had. The guy treated the White House like it was a frat house and his and Hillary\'s after-party activities stunk to high heaven, especially the great pardon sale.

[superfreakicus]

\"\"I don\'t play publically acclaimed favorites\". No real thought involved. You wager stictly upon a premise that even if the favorite wins the odds will be too low to warrant wagering upon that favorite. So you toss most all 6-5 horses and wager on those with big chances.\"

that is true, I do.
I also toss easy throwouts like war emblem.

\" Horses like Perfect Dread. Oh sure I think he was better than he showed, but who really thought he had a prayer to get 12 marks with courage at the end?\"

apparently, a lot of people did.
that\'s why his price was so terrible, forcing me to go w/medaglia as a key at 16-1.
maybe you\'d like to show me some examples of people who thought he couldn\'t get the distance --- because the way I remember it, everybody thought he was the best bred to handle it.
not that I pay much attention to that anymore.

by the way, what kind of \'courage\' are we talking about?
the kind medaglia showed facing adversity in the derby to run 4th, or the kind war emblem showed, coughing it up while facing very similar adversity in the belmont?
(not that I use \'courage\' to handicap)

\"No Superman, we both lost the Belmont, my horse just always had a bigger chance than yours is all.\"

didn\'t look like it to me.
but, I wasn\'t using binoculars.

ps

as for my picks, I actually DID post a few in the CD pick 4 thread.
unfortunately, they turned up fairly chalky, for me, but maybe I can squeeze out a little value here or there.
maybe you\'d like to add your analysis to the thread....

[Anonymous User]

On the one hand you demostrate some insight by understanding how bad the Grand Sleaze was as a president and on the other hand you mischaracterize why a lawsuit isn\'t filed. I\'m certain everyone in this room has been wronged or robbed. It happens almost everytime the track stewards make a knee jerk ruling. But because you\'re arguement doesn\'t prevail it doens\'t mean you were lying or that you were even wrong. All it means is sometimes the circumstances prevent the proper outcome. It happens at the track, it happens in the court room and it happens all the time in politics. Anything requiring the judgement of a collective mass is a dangerous thing. Mostly because individuals and groups are so easily mislead. That\'s what T Graph is fighting.

I think


lol

[TGJB]

superfreakicus wrote:
>
> \"\"I don\'t play publically acclaimed favorites\". No real
> thought involved. You wager stictly upon a premise that even
> if the favorite wins the odds will be too low to warrant
> wagering upon that favorite. So you toss most all 6-5 horses
> and wager on those with big chances.\"
>
> that is true, I do.
> I also toss easy throwouts like war emblem.
>
> \" Horses like Perfect Dread. Oh sure I think he was better
> than he showed, but who really thought he had a prayer to get
> 12 marks with courage at the end?\"
>
> apparently, a lot of people did.
> that\'s why his price was so terrible, forcing me to go
> w/medaglia as a key at 16-1.
> maybe you\'d like to show me some examples of people who
> thought he couldn\'t get the distance --- because the way I
> remember it, everybody thought he was the best bred to handle
> it.
> not that I pay much attention to that anymore.
>
> by the way, what kind of \'courage\' are we talking about?
> the kind medaglia showed facing adversity in the derby to run
> 4th, or the kind war emblem showed, coughing it up while
> facing very similar adversity in the belmont?
> (not that I use \'courage\' to handicap)
>
> \"No Superman, we both lost the Belmont, my horse just always
> had a bigger chance than yours is all.\"
>
> didn\'t look like it to me.
> but, I wasn\'t using binoculars.
>
> ps
>
> as for my picks, I actually DID post a few in the CD pick 4
> thread.
> unfortunately, they turned up fairly chalky, for me, but
> maybe I can squeeze out a little value here or there.
> maybe you\'d like to add your analysis to the thread....

TG--You may have noticed we edited the curses. Knock it off or I\'ll have to censor you, and I really don\'t want to do that.

[TGJB]

1. On the question of whether not responding to the letter is significant: I made allegations and sent transcripts with them--if my allegations were false (or if the transcripts didn\'t say what I said) don\'t you think they would have responded? You\'ve seen them make wisecracks on their site about me(like Jake\'s crack that started this a couple of days ago ON THIS SUBJECT), yet they wouldn\'t respond if they were in a position to embarass me? They took the position they did because although leaving things unanswered was harmful, they had no choice, and at least 90% of their customers don\'t come to the websites, and so don\'t know about it.

2. Even if you ignore the above, using your own reasoning, you have no way of making a \"determination\"--yet you have held my response against me. Huh?

3. Those Rag posters you refer to who come here to do me damage--why do you think that is? Who would have a motive to spread the stories that are repeated here over and over? Do you see any TG players doing that? (I\'m not talking about challenging numbers, picks, betting strategy or anything else that\'s on the record--that\'s fair game. Soup, I\'m setting you up here--be careful.)

4. Think about why Ragozin doesn\'t sell online. He has the technology now--anyone can download samples when Friedman posts them. Could it be because he wants to keep that 90% away form my posts and Red Board Room?

5. You have characterized our marketing as negativity--completely untrue, in fact, 180 degrees off. Ragozin\'s in the field marketing is negativity, but only when I\'m not in a position to respond--they ignore  us on the web as a matter of strategy. We\'re the ones with the Red Board Room and Race of The Week--my use of Raggies here is to demonstrate what goes on daily, and counter it. That\'s why I encourage them to post.

[TGJB]

1. Yeah, no-one else would have ever thought of using a graph because they\'re so seldom used. Good thing Columbus \"discovered\" America, otherwise there would be no-one here.

2. All those car companies that ripped off Henry Ford should be boycotted.

3. You\'re right, I\'m an illiterate paranoid moron. Keep those cards and letters coming.

[TGJB]

If I know roughly where it was I would send people to it--it would save me a lot of work.

[Two Bucks]

More name calling from the republican scum who can\'t argue on the facts. But I suppose you\'re celibate and wouldn\'t mind answering questions about your sex life under oath. With the truck driver mouth you got I wouldn\'t be surprised if you\'re a lesbian or something.

[Friendly]

Pappy Jer,

I\'m glad that you finally admitted that you did steal intellectual property from Ragozin.

I\'m also glad to see that you backed down from your post of \"letter lies\" and don\'t want to discuss your allegations point by point - it would not have been pretty for you.

I do think it is funny that you insist that Ragozin is guilty of your lies until proven innocent - sounds about right for you. The way you like to lie and tell partial truths, I bet you were a big fan of Slick Willie, weren\'t you? Keep up the good work Pop\'s. Hope you got my Father\'s Day card.

Jerry, JR.

[TGJB]

This ain\'t the place, but if you\'re up at Saratoga we can discuss Clinton over a drink at Siro\'s--and it has nothing to do with his politics, whatever they were.

[TGJB]

God you\'re dumb.