Author Topic: bellamy road is back  (Read 1008 times)

pres711

  • Posts: 54
    • View Profile
bellamy road is back
« on: April 21, 2006, 02:52:46 PM »
sinister minister is bellamy road with less time to recover.  beyer even wrote a similar article touting his number. history tends to repeat itself sometimes.  good luck to all

Chuckles_the_Clown2

  • Guest
Re: bellamy road is back
« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2006, 07:17:30 PM »
pres711 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sinister minister is bellamy road with less time
> to recover.  beyer even wrote a similar article
> touting his number. history tends to repeat itself
> sometimes.  good luck to all

Quite a bit of difference actually. It always amazes me that people can draw generalizations upon so many things without scrutiny of the subject matter at hand. You can talk a nation into war that way. Just imagine what that type of broad brush will get you wagering upon horses.

First lets look at the Track Bellamy Road ran upon that April 9th, 2005. It certainly was fast for Bellamy Road. He tied Riva Ridge\'s 32 year old record. However, it wasn\'t fast for him alone. In the 7 furlong Carter two horses tied the 6 furlong track record with their interior fractions. The Carter\'s final time was only a click or two off the track record for 7 furlongs. New York bred Slow Rats went an interior six poles in 1.10 and gasped out in 8 in 1.37 An immature Lost in the Fog went 1.21.1

That track was torrid.

Conversely the only horse that ran a racehorse time on Blue Grass day was Sinister Minister. You could look it up.

Secondly, Bellamy Road was refered to as a horse with a \"high cruising speed\". What that means is a horse that really wants to run out front. His problem was when he entered the Derby there were a couple he just couldn\'t outquick and his high cruising speed became a high chasing speed. Thats not good for that type of horse. Now, who think Sinister Minister is a \"high cruising speed\" horse? Or in other words regardless of what hole he draws will he be disadvantaged like Bellamy Road was?

Lastly, you\'ll have to guess.

Socratic Method...sheez



bellsbendboy

  • Posts: 403
    • View Profile
Re: bellamy road is back
« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2006, 08:26:32 PM »
Hey CTC  

My guess is indeed two different scenarios.  

Bellamy Road was a bad ass Graded stakes winner who won his 3yo debut by fifteen lengths.  He won the Wood easily, but worked \"soft\" at Churchill and came unglued.

Sinister Minister had an acceptable debut, behind a runaway winner on a sealed track, Then, three weeks later Becerra put him up for sale!!!  True he won the Bluegrass, and ran fast, but he is going backwards. He finished up on his left lead despite unrelenting left hand pressure and could not gallop four days afterward, so Baffert jogged him.  His jockey decided not to ride him back before the win photo was taken.

I do not care what figure TG, Beyer or aunt Jane gives Sinister, he\'s nowhwere in Louisville and 50-50 to ever win again. bbb
 

kev

  • Posts: 634
    • View Profile
Re: bellamy road is back
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2006, 08:41:35 PM »
I think SM will take a little bit more money than alot of people think he will. If they list him at 12-1 he\'ll be 8-1 to 10-1 no? I\'m tossing Sin, Brother, L.Ron for right now. I\'m liking Bob&John and Barbaro.

Chuckles_the_Clown2

  • Guest
Let there be ROCK
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2006, 08:58:03 PM »
bellsbendboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey CTC  
>
> My guess is indeed two different scenarios.  
>
> Bellamy Road was a bad ass Graded stakes winner
> who won his 3yo debut by fifteen lengths.  He won
> the Wood easily, but worked \"soft\" at Churchill
> and came unglued.
>
> Sinister Minister had an acceptable debut, behind
> a runaway winner on a sealed track, Then, three
> weeks later Becerra put him up for sale!!!  True
> he won the Bluegrass, and ran fast, but he is
> going backwards. He finished up on his left lead
> despite unrelenting left hand pressure and could
> not gallop four days afterward, so Baffert jogged
> him.  His jockey decided not to ride him back
> before the win photo was taken.
>
> I do not care what figure TG, Beyer or aunt Jane
> gives Sinister, he\'s nowhwere in Louisville and
> 50-50 to ever win again. bbb

Bellsend, just for the record, you did post that First Samurai was a monster. I admit that he was my primary number two horse last Saturday, but all along I\'ve made clear to this board that horse was not a Derby horse and now he\'s gone. Last year, I was adamantly against Bellamy Road when most thought he was the second coming. That said, I did not bet against Bellamy Road on bounce. I considered him mis-scored and vulnerable to both distance and a pace challenge. I made a nuisance of myself, but I\'m certainly on the record if anyone cares to double check.

Last year these debates raged pre-Derby. This year it appears that Thorograph has elected to withhold their data on these races until after the event. Thats certainly their prerogative even if it makes this board a little more dull. It will also insulate them from us second guessing their figures, if that was contemplated by them. But if you followed the key horses into those final preps its not hard to estimate how fast they ran in those preps. It might make an interesting contest to project what Tgraph assigned in the preps and declare a winner post Derby for who was closest. Here are my estimates:

Wood winner -1
Bluegrass winner -4
Illinois Derby winner -2
S.A. Derby winner 1
Ark winner -1

If you\'re saying that Sinister Minister ran too fast and is a no play if he runs in the Derby, its quite likely that Tgraph is going to say the same thing. Ragozin\'s spokesman is already saying it. Assuming it to be true, I\'m not altogether sure not galloping for four days after a tough race like the Bluegrass is out of the ordinary at all. Especially for Baffert. I\'m also not sure Garret Gomez is on the right horse, or if it even was his choice. It wouldnt\' be the first time a jockey and/or his agent tried to be handicappers.

Bottom line is this: I\'ve taken positions against big figure horses when I think the figure is off, but to this point I will not dispute a mature horse Blue Grass figure for Sinister Minister. He may not repeat it at Churchill Downs, but he may not have to. I\'m also not going to dismiss a 12-1 to 15-1 or more horse for being so fast he probably came unglued in his last, especially when its likely a price horse like that is going to pull his conditions. If he runs, I expect a first class effort out of Sinister Minister that literally buries some very highly regarded animals. He may not cross the wire first, but if he runs hes gonna rock their world.





RICH

  • Posts: 837
    • View Profile
Re: Let there be ROCK
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2006, 04:49:00 AM »
Sinister Minister -4

RICH

  • Posts: 837
    • View Profile
Re: Let there be ROCK
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2006, 04:56:25 AM »
Just to be clear, that -4 on SM is a guess.