\"Consider \"ship\" a 4 letter word. are the connections the last people on earth to realize this?\"
I didn\'t think yesterday was the ideal spot for him. I wouldn\'t have chosen that race for him. But if they weren\'t the last ones to realize shipping was an issue, then I was.
In the past, all his ships had an excuse.
He was vanned off of the track in his race prior to coming to NY in 2005 after a very long and hard campaign. I\'ve seen dozens of top horse wear down and fall apart late in the year after having raced at a high level all year long. He gave a clear clue he was done.
He was bad that day in NY, but they sent him overseas anyway where he got destroyed again. To me, sending him overseas at that stage was an obvious error. He was having some problems and needed a rest badly.
In the 2006 BC, he chased a fast pace on the outside (on a GR day) against horses that IMO were better than him. He was also at the end of an extremely tough campaign.
I thought it was reasonable to look at all of those races and not be 100% convinced whether he was bad because of the ship, point of form cycle issues, quality of competition, or some combination of the above.
Yesterday convinced me that shipping (and maybe drugs) are at least part of the problem. He\'s simply not that bad. He never faced the best turfers in America, but he has won Grade 1 turf events that contained good horses and earned figures comparable to his dirt form. He was fresh and fit going over there and from what I read was doing very well. He was too terrible yesterday to think that the ship/drugs weren\'t a factor.