With all this abuse of the “rush to judgment” cliché, I feel like I’m back at the O.J. trial.
With fatal breakdowns at a record high, the CHRB was under great urgency to make a major change and as the TOC statement points out, the decision was made on the basis of good data. As a statistician, I can say without hesitation that the evidence was, and remains, compelling that all-weather tracks be developed and installed with all due speed.
JB, while I believe you to be honest in your reservations, I do see parallels between many who oppose the CHRB decision and those who initially opposed civil and gay rights legislation on racist or homophobic grounds and then switched to a “rush to judgment” criticism when their position became untenable, as a last ditch attempt to delay change. Especially those whose criticism against engineered tracks is that they are \"unnatural\".
As to whether Santa Anita Management or Cushion Track are most responsible here, the fact is there will be a learning curve and setbacks are inevitable no matter how much time is wasted and how many lives are lost before all the synthetic track critics are satisfied.
Bob