Miff,
Finally have a chance to respond. I\'m not directly criticizing Andy Beyer, I\'m simply pointing out that as one of the most reknown cappers in the business, he seems to have thrown up his hands and scratched his head, and given up on trying to find the solution to winning on artificial. My response was in regard to his article in the DRF where he seems exasperated. NO doubt, his inability to be the expert on the artificial is a helluva blow to his ego. I\'ve never questioned Andy\'s ability to handicap a horse race, his reputation and results speak for themselves. But please remember, being the top dog indefinitely or having things all your own way is not a birthright. At some point, you got to adjust, if you can\'t solve the artificial programs, and you\'re high profile like Mr. Beyer, its pretty unbecoming to whine about it.
As far as the guys who bet a chunk and have given up the \"speed\" angle, that\'s just the way the game is now, they\'ll have to adjust or stay out of the artificials. To me, its a case of allowing the game to pass you by, or at the minimum, it limits your ability to play all the circuits now. Myself, with all respect, I don\'t feel sorry for them. This game is fluid, always has been, many of the old cappers just liked it when they had all the time and most of the knowledge and so the game belonged to them. Not any more.
I\'m in my mid 50\'s, and I told my best male friend, strictly a form handicapper, about 25 years ago that this is a game of drugs, equipment and surface. Either you\'re in the game or you\'re on the outside looking in.
In a nutshell, this is the problem with those struggling to make sense of the artificial surfaces: they continue to want to believe that all artificials are the same. THEY ARE NOT. Poly is a totally separated surface. Cushion and Pro Ride are very similar, and Tapeta is a little similar to Cushion and Pro, but bears no resemblance to Poly. The sooner the cappers decide that Poly is a distinct surface, the more success they\'ll enjoy.
I apologize for the lengthy answer, but I\'ll entertain opposing viewpoints on surfaces, etc. Again, I know virtually nothing about Thorograph methodology. So, I have no intend on insulting any of the guys because much of the time I am scratching my head to figure out what the hell everybody in here is referring to. Laughing here now.