TGJB,
Couple of ideas here.
Anytime a person or a group of people want to try to get their point across, its best to have a plan, or consider suggestions.
The Coalition at least represents a start, and may really impact the situation.
For someone who wants to take the time for a project, I would offer the following suggestion:
Look at the Keeneland Result Charts from last Sunday, 4-20-08. I\'ll give you one example of how horseplayers can help make their own case.
7f poly race, the mutuel pool was $ 185K, with an additional $ 252K in exotics, totally @ $ 430K.
Turf race at Keeneland, mutuel pool $ 457K, with $ 673K in exotics. That\'s say a little something there, right?
I\'m not gonna take the time and look at what KEE keeps in the straight action vs. the exotics, so I\'m just using some easy numbers here.
Say 18% on the straight action and 23% on the exotics.
(Don\'t jump my case here, I\'m just illustrating).
In the 7f poly race, the track \"keeps\" say $ 93K. (185K X 18%)+ 252K X .23%) =
@ $ 93,000.00 for the track.
The turf race, the track \"keeps\" $ 237K. (457K X 18%) + ( 673K X 23%) =
@ $ 237,000 for the track.
Two different races at the same track on different surfaces and the turf exceeds the poly race handle/interest by...how much? A bunch.
Do you suppose this is true at Santa Anita also? Take a peek at their mutuels and see what you find.
I know, I intermingled the P3 pool. I know there are other costs associated with each of the races, but my point being..why help the track generate large profits in the turf races, when so many gamblers want the artificial to go away?
Now I know guys are gonna say, what about the Bluegrass and the $ 1M plus handle? I know that. Gamblers across the country are still gonna play that big race, so are virtually all the fans at the other tracks around the country.
As I type this, I know this is ripe for contradiction or criticism, but I\'m throwing it out to at another way of looking at things.
If you don\'t like Joe Blow\'s Supermarket, you don\'t have to shop there. If you want to impact their cash register, you go in, pick the cherries, ad items, all their loss leaders and hit the checkstand. It works for your wallet and in a small way impacts their bottom line.
That\'s it. A realistic, methodical plan on how to impact the bottom lines of racetracks seems the logical way to go. If Keeneland is non-profit, as many tracks are, it still impacts their purse structure, their ability to bring in more and bigger stables. I know lesser quality of horses. I know, almost without exception, the powers-that-be, could care less about the gambler, I don\'t need a lecture on that aspect. Etc. etc, etc.
Have at it Chuckles.