Good point, APny. This is what\'s good, and no so good, about racing and handicapping today.
We all love Jerry and hope his horses run well and win. But when I projected a figure for Student Council, I wrote beside his Racing Form past performances next to his name: \"Recent return to Asmussen! Injected today!? To Bridgemohan! Back to top!? New top here!? -0? -1? -2?\" [Those who thought similarly, killed the race when SC won at a great 7-1.] Sorry, but that\'s how we all must handicap in today\'s environment. Assuming Gotcha Gold ran the 0 again, Student Council ran a really big race. What provoked this? Student Council\'s natural development, at age 6? Or was the performance provoked by some kind of (legal) energizing injection from his new barn? Last year at this time, Asmussen\'s Curlin was rolling along with a nice straight line at an already preposterous level: 0... 0... 0... 0... into the Preakness. Then, WHAM!, at Pimlico: Curlin exploded to a -3 on short rest. Anyone who\'s seen major or minor move-ups and explosions from Team Asmussen over the past 6 months, must form their own opinion about whether these are provoked by natural development.
John T Chance