ronwar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I might get some fire after this, but I like
> Dutrow. In the sense he\'s genuine. Doesn\'t
> pretend to be anything than what he is. Which
> turns out to be what people dislike. In the
> season of fake smiles, scripted answers, and baby
> kissing, he is authentic. What ya see is what ya
> get, which is refreshing, at least to me. I\'m a
> Mayweather fan as well, but know plenty that can\'t
> stand the guy. He\'s a personality, just as Dutrow
> is and sometimes what makes sports, all sports so
> intriguing is not only the ones you love to root
> for, but the ones you love to root against. I\'m
> glad that he\'s not just another stale suit with
> the same statements from the trainers handbook on
> interviews.
This is interesting. I, too, admit to being charmed by Dutrow and his personality which I find positive, refreshing, and charismatic. The conundrum is to reconcile that very positive image with two very negative potential things that, if proven, are deplorable -- those being that he may cheat to move horses up and he might lie to deceive the public or others who in good faith rely on his comments.
To steal a device from TGJB, we are only looking at one side of the house when we say how much we like Dutrow. While that side that we see may look great, we honestly cannot see the other sides of the house. In this case, the difference may be even more stark, but we do not truly know.