Along those lines: horses that get disqualified for drug positives should lose eligibility for that condition. The situation one sometimes sees where a horse wins a maiden, starts running against winners, gets disqualified from its maiden win, then drops back against maidens, (or having one a 1x in the meantime is again eligible for a 1x by virtue of losing its maiden score) just creates a chance for two betting scores for the connections.
And/or: horses that get disqualified for drugs should not only lose the purse for the race in question, but should have an amount equal to the purse money they lost due to the drug positive deducted from their subsequent on-track winnings which would be earmarked for drug testing.
That should get the connections thinking twice.
Another change I would welcome would be if in the Past Performances instead of just saying \'disqualified from purse money,\' they would say \'disqualified for purse money for drug positive.\'
And, of course, instead of just saying \'previously trained by Rick Dutrow,\' the line would read, \'previously trained by Rick Dutrow suspended for drug positive.\" Of course, that would take an editorial committment, the type of spine the Daily Racing Firm has not shown evidence of in the past (or in the present.)