Whether or not surface considerations were an issue, this is the second
potential Eclipse Award winner who will not be running on the \"Pro Ride\",
joining, apparently, Curlin.
Hate to repeat myself, but Churchill or Belmont should consider running all of
their high purse graded dirt stakes on the last weekend in October.
Maybe \"collaborate\" and present a day of dirt racing which includes dirt racing
from both venues (though \"collaborate\" not a word frequently used by the
management of racing facilities in this country). Maybe run these races on the
Sunday after the BC races, though I know many think that competing with pro
football and baseball\'s World Series is futile.
Some folks out there might jump on me as a synthetic \"hater\", but that is not
the case. I just think that horsemen and horseplayers deserve options. If there
is going to be racing on 3 separate surfaces (Dirt, turf, synthetic) why not
allow for champions to perform on 3 separate surfaces?
Possible Future Scenario: In 2012, there are 2 outstanding older horses. Each
horse has won 3 Grade 1 stakes-- horse \"A\" has won 3 Gr 1s on synthetic, horse
\"B\" has won 3 Gr 1s on dirt. \"A\" and \"B\" have beaten equally respectable fields
and have run times close to the track records in their races. Neither one
of \"A\" or \"B\" races in the BC Classic, which is won by a rank outsider who does
not possess the credentials of either \"A\" or \"B\". Your Eclipse Award winning
Older Horse in this scenario is....? (or will there eventually be Eclipses
awarded for performers on both non-turf surfaces?)
[Of course, the Champion could be determined by who was awarded the lowest TG#
and TGJB could present the award]
If the BC ever returns to natural terra firma, I would have no problem
with a series of high purse graded races being run on a synthetic surface
on the same weekend as the BC dirt races.
Change is good, but so is having a choice. CD, NYRA, get to work on this right
away.