disclaimer that I obviously haven\'t seen all of the sheet numbers for all of the horses for the Travers since they won\'t be posted until later but....
....how in God\'s name is Tale of Ekati 20-1 on the ML
What has this horse done so wrong that he has been totally dimissed?
1) He ran very well as a 2 year old, including in the BC
2) He won the wood, earnings a \"0\" in the process which stands as one of the best figs anyone in this group has earned
3) He ran well in the Derby, at least better than those he will run against here in the Travers.
4) He had half of his hoof torn off in the early stages of the Belmont and he doesn\'t want to go 1 1/2 anyway so I think he has an excuse there (I also posted on the Friday before the Belmont that I thought he looked terribe on the track the day before) so I really do think he has a legit excuse for the Belmont
5) Tagg said BEFORE the Jim Dandy that the horse was short for that race and that he was using it more as a prep for the Jim Dandy
6) He has worked well in preparation for the race
7) Tagg\'s horses are running well at the Spa

He should save ground all the way around from down on the rail.
Again, I haven\'t seen all of the numbers for all of the horses but I believe his wood \"0\" stacks up well here and he beat alot of the horses that are shorter in the ML already (ie. Pyro and Col John in the Derby).
I could be in trouble in this one if he goes off anywhere near his 20-1 ML, someone call chase and tell them to lock down my home equity line.
More practically, someone talk me off this beast at 20-1 before I get myself in alot of trouble.
Serioulsy though, what am I missing about that ML?